I must say that “The Railroad Earth” by Jack Kerouac was an
interesting read. The story has so many literary elements and his language is
so reflective I began to almost empathize with the narrated experience. His
descriptions were so playful and nonconforming and yet you find the entire
passage full of literary devices. At first I found a few errors and then
realized that they were left there on purpose. Life is full of unexpected
surprises and his writing emulates that effect. I had a hard time keeping pace with his fluctuating
expressions and thought processes since the entire passage tickles the brain
with streams of consciousness. Kerouac endlessly writes run on sentences
expressing an entire thought streaming into the mind at levels that literally
create a mindscape (escape from reality) of inner feelings as if to have a conversation with himself,
like an interior monologue.
Some of the key factors in this particular work have obvious
literary devices while he simultaneously freewrites. I thinks it’s interesting
that his freewriting is incorporated to create patterns in his thought process.
This is where I see the literary elements and his spontaneity. He originally
writes long sentences using just the basic quotes and periods to separate his
thoughts but then he causally begins to add caesuras. This literary device is
commonly used in poetry or music and his story is full of them; they are the dashes that create pauses to a thought. For example, on
page 42 in my ebook he uses it to end the sentence “‘eat or get out-t-t-t-‘—“
which not only stops the thought but specifically puts emphasis on the pronunciation
of the word “out” adding yet another literary device; onomatopoeia, which is
used to mimic the sound it is describing.
In this case he describes his walks
up Harrison with sound emphasis saying “the boom-crash of truck traffic” putting the
mind into yet another depth of his interior monologue. Kerouac imitates sounds throughout the text entertaining the reader through his stream of thought. I liken his writing to the flashes of light that peak
through the windows of a train passing through the tunnel because you only get glimpses of what he tries to express and then the reader tunes out until he imitates some form of sound bringing the reader back into his stream of consciousness.
As his writing
fluctuates, his expressions and thought process leave the reader to contemplate
on the next journey of what seems to be a detour. Kerouac serves as a tour guide that maps your mind into what seems to be a detour of culdesacs (streets with no exit) that
does not relate to the next thought but brings you to a whole new road map like a tree with limbs. One of my
favorite lines is as follows and serves as an example of his abstract thinking:
I put the light
out on the sad dab mad grub
little diving room
and hustle out into the fog of the flow,
descending the creak
hall steps where the old men are
not yet sitting with Sunday morn papers because still
asleep or some of them I can now as I leave hear
begin-
ning to disfawdle to wake in their rooms with their
moans and yorks and scrapings and horror sounds, I’m
going down the steps to work, glance to check time of
watch with clerk cage clock.— (48)
The words seem to have a rhyme at one moment and then the next they contain alliteration repeating not the word but the same sound of the word making the reading a little frustrating but interesting. Kerouac is playful in describing the context of the story not only in his expressions but the figurative meanings as well. I found it a little frustrating to keep up with his abstract thinking but this is how he manipulates the mind; highlighting the journey into his stream of consciousness allows the reader to mindscape which is a way of temporarily escaping reality in his interior monologue. He is both creative and innovative in this particular work which I thought is the best I've read so far from his collections. Thankfully it was a shorter piece.
The words seem to have a rhyme at one moment and then the next they contain alliteration repeating not the word but the same sound of the word making the reading a little frustrating but interesting. Kerouac is playful in describing the context of the story not only in his expressions but the figurative meanings as well. I found it a little frustrating to keep up with his abstract thinking but this is how he manipulates the mind; highlighting the journey into his stream of consciousness allows the reader to mindscape which is a way of temporarily escaping reality in his interior monologue. He is both creative and innovative in this particular work which I thought is the best I've read so far from his collections. Thankfully it was a shorter piece.
I believed that he employed some of the same techniques in "On The Road." I like to call it high-energy words. The words and structure have so much charge and flare that you can't help but say them out loud and smile. It's something children do a lot when they recount something that happened during their day.
ReplyDeleteYes, I agree with the similarities in ON THE ROAD. I think they definitely are high energy words because they highlight the point he is trying to make in every increment. I believe they call it Jazz chanting, which is what they use in the classroom to help students remember or recount lessons. I think Kerouac definitely used this technique to recount moments of importance.
DeleteWow, I totally didn't even recall analyzing the literary elements at all. I really like your post because it help solidify my opinions on the assigned readings. I loved the onomatopoeias because they helped paint a better picture in my head as I was reading. Reading your post and looking back at it, I see that there is more to this story than lengthy rambles. Good Job Angel!
ReplyDeleteThanks, I'm glad it helped solidify your opinions on the readings. Kerouac's reading was a bit overwhelming but with so many elements, they were too obvious to ignore.
DeleteI really enjoyed how you analyzed the literary devices. It really brought the piece back into focus for me. For Kerouac though it may have been more of a controlled free-write rather than the true sense of the word.
ReplyDeleteI can see where Kerouac does control his free writing independent of the rules of literacy, I just found it interesting that he purposely added the elements the way that he did which is why I believe that he mixed them both.
ReplyDelete